Jessica is a 2 ½ year old girl who was evaluated at 7
months of age for failure to thrive and enlargement of her liver and
spleen. She was found to have Gaucher’s disease, a genetic (recessive)
lipid storage disease, the manifestations of which are due to the absence of an
enzyme. She was seen in consultation at a Pediatric Research
Center. It was not known which of three types of this disease she
has. She was begun 19 months ago on a 6-month trial of a replacement
enzyme, which is approved for and effective in preventing the manifestations of
the disease in two of the three types of Gaucher’s disease. The family
was unable to return to the Research Center for the 6-month follow-up
visit. The treatment has been continued, and, at her parents’ urging, her
dosage has been increased to higher than normal. She has had frequent
long hospital admissions (infections and seizures) and she has developed
problems suggestive of progressive disease (including respiratory failure; she
has been on a ventilator at home for several months) strongly suggesting to her
physicians that she has the more severe type of this disease that does not
benefit from enzyme replacement.
On the other hand, her liver and spleen have
decreased in size, she has survived longer than the average for patients with
the more severe type (typically, death before age two), her parents point out
that she has grown some, and they are convinced that she shows signs of
neurologic development while at home. However, during her frequent
hospitalizations, she has shown minimal awareness; at best she smiles, responds
to her parents, and follows simple commands. She is currently at home and
receives total parental nutrition, home mechanical ventilation, a morphine drip
(for bone pain) and the intravenous enzyme every 14 days.
Jessica’s overall therapy is somewhat expensive, but
her parents are easily able to afford it. Both Dr. Burgess, Jessica’s
primary pediatrician, and the research consultant believe the enzyme is no
longer medically indicated. In addition, Dr. Burgess is concerned that
progressive disease and invasive treatments are causing her sufficient
suffering that continued treatment might be inappropriate if it is merely
postponing her inevitable death.
Jessica’s parents are her caregivers at home, and
they have declined assistance from home nursing. They have no other
children. Her mother no longer works outside the home so is able to be
home full time, and her father has reduced his work as an accountant to part
time in order to help. Friends from their church are supportive and
help the family in many ways. You are
the physician on the case, what do you do?
No comments:
Post a Comment