J.R.
is a combative 21-year-old female who presents in the emergency room
disoriented, with a fever, chills, and a cough.
J.R. is well known by the medical staff.
She has had three previous admissions with endocarditis and twice has
left the hospital AMA. On her most
recent previous admission her mitral valve was replaced with a porcine
prosthesis. J.R. is HIV positive and has
a history of prostitution and substance abuse.
She refuses counseling. On the 12th day of her
hospitalization, J.R. leaves AMA even after her physician warns that the
bacteria in her blood is still active.
Two days later she returns to the ER and it is obvious her heart valve
must once again be replaced. J.R.
demands another valve, saying it would violate her civil rights to be refused. Would
it be wrong to refuse J.R.?
Labels
- 1 (4)
- 2 (21)
- 3 (16)
- abuse (1)
- advanced directives (1)
- anorexia (2)
- artificial nutrition and hydration (4)
- autonomy (2)
- baby doe laws (2)
- Brain Death (1)
- confidentiality (5)
- conscientious objections (2)
- cultural clash (5)
- decision making (1)
- decision making capacity (20)
- designer babies (1)
- disability (2)
- discharge planning (1)
- end of life issues (11)
- futility (1)
- genetic screening (4)
- health care teamwork (2)
- HIV (1)
- impaired physician (1)
- informed consent (3)
- intersex (1)
- issues with rationing and allocation (5)
- mental health (3)
- organ donation (2)
- pain management (3)
- palliative care (2)
- patient autonomy (22)
- pediatric cases (23)
- Physician assisted suicide (3)
- prenatal care (7)
- refusal of care (5)
- religious preferences (12)
- substance abuse (1)
- surrogate decision making (6)
No comments:
Post a Comment