As
a second-year neurology resident, Dr. Johnson has been fascinated by the case
of Mr. Thompson, a construction worker who was nailing shingles to a roof when
his co-worker's gun slipped, lodging a nail deep into Mr. Thompson's frontal
lobe. Although comatose at first, Mr. Thompson regained consciousness and
function under Dr. Johnson's care. is as important as the decision he or she reaches.
Despite
his physical improvements after this accident, everyone in Mr. Thompson's life
agreed that he was "not himself." Previously a gregarious, sunny man,
according to his family and friends, he had now become surly, withdrawn, and
disinhibited. Before the accident Mr. Thompson loved having his friends and
family around; now he threw everyone out of the room at the slightest
provocation, all the while cursing and screaming. Happily married to his wife
for 27 years, Mr. Thompson had three children and no prior history of medical
or psychiatric disorders. After his accident, however, he disparaged and
insulted his wife when she visited and refused to see his children. He had a
living will in the chart in which his wife was named as his health care proxy.
During his recovery from the accident she had made decisions for him.
When
Mr. Thompson had made good progress in his physical recovery, the neurosurgery
team brought up the topic of removing the nail lodged in his skull, presenting
the risks and benefits of the surgery to Mrs. Thompson. Even though the
operation would be tricky, the surgeons firmly believed that the benefits outweighed
the risks. Mrs. Thompson opposed the surgery, but Mr. Thompson was adamant
about going ahead with it.
Dutifully,
Dr. Johnson assessed his patient's capacity. Mr. Thompson was alert and
oriented to person, place, and time; he passed the cognitive exam with flying
colors. He verbalized understanding of his situation, stated clearly his
treatment options and the risks and benefits of his surgery. He appeared to
meet all the clinical benchmarks for decision-making capacity, and he was
adamant that he no longer wished for his wife to be his health care proxy.
Dr.
Johnson asked his team what they thought. The junior resident said, "the
guy has a traumatic brain injury. He's literally not himself—he's a different
person. He's impaired. That's the bottom line."
"I
disagree," the senior resident said. "He's clearly oriented and
capable of abstract reasoning.
Personality changes don't mean you can trample on his autonomy."
*http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/2008/03/pdf/ccas1-0803.pdf
*http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/2008/03/pdf/ccas1-0803.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment