Showing posts with label artificial nutrition and hydration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label artificial nutrition and hydration. Show all posts

Deborah


Deborah is a sixty-eight-year-old patient with advanced dementia.  Her appetite has slowly decreased over the past two months, and had a particularly low appetite the past five days.  The care team at the nursing home has offered the option of a percutaneous endoscopic gastronomy (PEG tube) to help provide nutrients she is not getting from oral intake.  Dr. Johnson explains that the benefits are limited in this case with dementia.  He explains that the patients often try to pull out their tubes in their diminished conscious state.  Dr. Johnson leaves the decision up to her children, Robert and Ann, along with her sister Betty.  Robert and Ann agree that the feeding tube should not be placed, stating that their mother is gone, she is no longer the tough woman they know to be their mommy.  Robert states that it would be best to simply let nature take its course, if she is meant to die.  Betty is outraged at their decision.  She yells how can you let your mommy starve to death, she is a fighter would not want to die.  Betty argues that Deborah is a devout Catholic, and that her sister would have wanted the feeding tube, because she believed all life was precious.  No one can argue against Deborah’s belief that she valued all forms of life, which was clearly indicated by her strong stance of supporting pro-life movements.  However, her children still believe that the feeding tube should not be placed, because they believe their mother would be harmed more than she would benefit from the feeding tube.
            Before Deborah entered the nursing home, her children lived several hundred miles away and only got to see their mother several times a year, during holidays and birthdays.  During these times, Deborah refused to discuss her opinions about the early signs of dementia, and her health, stating she did not want to ruin the fun memories, and dampen the event.  However, Deborah and Betty have always been particularly close.  The two of them went to mass twice a week for the past ten years leading up to Deborah’s placement into the nursing home.  The past three years, while Deborah has been in the nursing home, Betty still made it a priority to visit her sister several times a week, especially on Thursday nights for bingo.  Betty also has seen how much Deborah has enjoyed the programs the nursing home puts on during the week, along with spending time with her friends at the nursing home.  Should Dr. Johnson place the feeding tube?

--Written by Amanda Zinger

Mrs. F

-->
Mrs. F is a 65-year-old woman with recurring medical problems as a result of many years of anorexia.  Mrs. F has mild dementia and she is having an increasingly difficult time taking care of herself.  One day she falls down the stairs in her home and breaks her hip.  When she is brought into the emergency room, it is clear that Mrs. F is malnourished, as her body resembles that of a much older woman.  Mrs. F refuses to eat, without any explanation.  Shortly into her ICU stay, Mrs. F has a stroke and she is quickly ventilated and given a PEG tube. Mrs. F has two daughters who come to see her at the hospital.  Mrs. F’s oldest daughter says that Mrs. F hated hospitals and doctors because she had once been institutionalized many years ago for her anorexia.  She asks doctors to stop all treatment and let her mother die in peace.  Mrs. F’s other daughter, however, claims that Mrs. F never wanted to eat and her earlier refusal is a symptom of her anorexia and not her wish to die.   Mrs. F has no advanced directives and the medical care needs to decide whether or not to remove Mrs. F’s feeding tube.

*Written by Devan Stahl

Mrs. Randall


Pauline Randall, a 65-year-old married woman with three adult children, has been suffering from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) for several years.  Her neurological condition has deteriorated so that she can no longer control any voluntary muscles.  Confined to a bed in a nursing home in a small Midwestern American city and breathing with the aid of a respirator, she communicates through the electronic monitor that responds to eyelid blinks.  She can ‘write’ words and brief sentences in this way.
            Mrs. Randall understands that her condition cannot be treated and that it will inevitably lead to her death.  But she has been an active participant in her health care and has been determined to continue functioning as long as possible.
            Her physician, Dr. Samuels, believes that she is not receiving adequate nutrition and that the time has come to insert a nasogastric feeding tube.  When he proposes this procedure to her, she blinks quickly, ‘No more!’ He asks, ‘Do you understand you will die slowly of starvation if we do not insert this feeding tube?” “Yes,” she blinks, “No more.”
            When Mrs. Randall’s family, which has been close and supportive through her illness, learns of her opposition, they have divided opinions.  Her husband believes that her wishes should be respected, but two of their three children are convinced that her life should be prolonged.  The nursing staff believes that she should not be made to suffer any longer.
            There is no question that Mrs. Randall is legally competent, that is, that she understands the procedure being proposed and the consequences of refusal.  Should her refusal of the feeding tube be honored, even though it will lead to her death?

* http://ethics.iit.edu/EEL/Right%20to%20Die.pdf

Patient Ed


Dr. Goldstein looked with concern at the small man lying in the ICU bed. The nursing home had brought him to the hospital because of lung congestion. Dr. Goldstein glanced back at his notes: Ed, age 67, a white male with diabetes, high blood pressure, and poor vision. Somewhat mentally retarded. Dr. Goldstein knew from past experience that Ed functioned at about a 10-year-old level and tended to think very literally. Oh yes, and a hearing problem, thought Dr. Goldstein, seeing Ed’s hearing aid gleam under the room light. “Ed,” Dr. Goldstein said loudly. “Ed, you have no control over your esophagus. When you swallow, food and water are going into your lungs, which is making you sick. You have developed pneumonia from the infection. We can treat the pneumonia, but we need to put you on a ventilator and a feeding tube. We’d sedate you so that it wasn’t uncomfortable.”

Ed stared up at Dr. Goldstein, blinking several times. His right eye drifted off to look into the corner of the room, but his other eye was focused on Dr. Goldstein.
“Do I get an operation?” Ed asked. “OK, but I don’t want tubes, and please don’t cut off my big toe.”

Dr. Goldstein sighed. Ed was running a fever and his oxygen levels were low in his blood. It was hard to talk to Ed in the best of times, so Dr. Goldstein wasn’t completely sure that Ed had understood him now. He tried again, shouting more loudly. “Ed! You have pneumonia. We need to treat it. You are very sick. We need to put in a ventilator and a feeding tube. Once the pneumonia is cured, we may be able to remove the tubes.”
Ed shook his head, eyes rolling. “Go away! No tubes! No tubes!” Dr. Goldstein looked at Ed’s file. Seven years ago, Ed had checked himself into the local nursing home. When he entered the nursing home, and again three years ago, a patient advocate had helped him fill out an Advance Directive which stated Ed’s medical wishes. Ed had clearly indicated that he did not want a ventilator, a feeding tube, or drastic cardiopulmonary measures such as CPR.

Dr. Goldstein wanted to put Ed on a ventilator, but it was fairly clear Ed didn’t want one. However, without the feeding tube and ventilator Ed would certainly die, probably in a week or two. Dr. Goldstein checked again. Ed had also filled out a Durable Power of Attorney, in which he stated he wanted his younger brother Bert to make medical decisions for him in the event he was no longer able to do so for himself.

Dr. Goldstein got up and left the room. He was convinced that it was time to call Bert. It wasn’t clear to Dr. Goldstein that Ed really understood what was happening to him, and Dr. Goldstein had always felt that it was courteous to involve the entire family when possible. Dr. Goldstein called Bert and explained the entire situation.

Bert is a rather shy, 63-year-old man. Living quietly at home, Bert has Crohn’s Disease and some arterial damage, including fairly major blockages in the arteries feeding his kidneys. Bert has never married, and he doesn’t like to make decisions. Bert sat down, still holding the telephone, and sighed. Poor Ed! What should he do?
After a long pause he mumbled, “Can I think about it and let you know tomorrow?”
“No,” said Dr. Goldstein firmly. “Bert, Ed’s not doing well. He has bad pneumonia, but he may be able to get better if we give him treatment and put him on a ventilator for a while. As you know, Ed’s against being on a ventilator, but I don’t think he understands that this may only be temporary. I don’t think his infection is letting him think clearly on his own. As his representative, you can decide to put him on a ventilator, but you need to understand the risks and benefits.”
Bert hesitated. “Um. What are the risks?”
Dr. Goldstein was more comfortable answering this question. “Bert, he has pneumonia, complicated by an esophageal defect. If we don’t treat him aggressively, he will almost certainly die, probably in a few days. There is a risk that we may not be able to remove the ventilator and feeding tube after the pneumonia is treated. It depends on the condition of his esophagus.”
Bert squirmed. “OK,” he sighed. “How about if you put him on the ventilator tonight, and if I change my mind tomorrow, then you can remove it?”
“Absolutely not,” Dr. Goldstein roared. “That would be murder!”

Finally Bert agreed to drive into the hospital, see Ed, and make a decision. After he hung up, Bert decided to call his nephew Eric. Eric might know what to do.
Eric was not at home. Bert left a message: “Eric, this is Uncle Bert. Ed is in the hospital. He has pneumonia and they say he needs tubes put in. But I know he doesn’t want them. Well, I just thought you might want to know. Sorry you weren’t home.”
Later that evening, Eric played the phone message. He immediately called Bert, but Bert was gone. Eric drove to the hospital to find out what was happening. He didn’t find Bert, but he was directed to the ICU unit, where he met Dr. Goldstein. Eric shook hands with Dr. Goldstein. “I’m Eric,” he said. “I’m Ed’s nephew. Ed’s older sister is my mother. I know there are patient privacy laws you can’t break, but I’d appreciate any information you can give me. If there is anything I can do to tell my mother or help my uncles, I’d like to know about it.

Dr. Goldstein was relieved Eric had shown up. Eric seemed to be someone he could talk to who would understand the situation and help Bert realize that Ed should get treatment.

*
--> http://sciencecases.lib.buffalo.edu/cs/files/treating_ed.pdf